##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

  •   Yusuf Budiono

  •   Dudi Permana

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to study the priority order of the criteria and sub-criteria that influence supplier selection and to find out which supplier or supplier of the best raw material, which best meets the criteria for selecting the supplier that should be selected. In this study only limited to 4 criteria, namely price, quality, warranty, and delivery. This research is a qualitative research using the calculation method used is the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method. The software used in using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method is version 3.2 super decisions. The findings show that the price criterion is the most important priority for companies to pay attention to, followed by delivery, quality, and warranty criteria.

Keywords: AHP, procurement, supplier selection

References

Azis, Iwan J. Dkk. (2010). Sustainable Development: Role and ContributionEmil Salim, Jakarta: KPG (Popular Gramedia Library).

Pujawan, I.N. & Mahendrawathi. (2017). Supply Chain Management, 3rd edition Yogyakarta: Andi.

Avila, P; Mota A, Pires A, Bastos J, Putnik G, and Teixeira J. (2012). Supplier's Selection Model Based on an Empirical Study. Procedia Technology, Vol.5, pp.627.

Dickson, G W. (1966). An analysis of vendor selection systems and decisions. Journal of Purchasing, Vol.2 (1), pp.5-17.

Saaty, T. L. & Kearns, K. P. (1985). Analytical Planning the Organization of Systems. Pergamon Press.

Saaty, T. L. (1994). Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory, RWS Publications, Pittsburgh.

Saaty, T.L. (2005). Theory and Applications of the Analytic Network Process: Decision Making with Benefits, Opportunities, Costs, and Risks. RWS Publications, USA.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

How to Cite
Budiono, Y., & Permana, D. (2021). Analysis of Propylene Glycol Raw Supplier Selection using the Analytic Hierarchy Process Method. European Journal of Business and Management Research, 6(2), 69-73. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejbmr.2021.6.2.783