##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

This study focuses on explaining the concept of farmers' cooperatives which contribute to raising the Omani economy, achieving security and food balance, and contributing to the eradication of poverty, hunger and unemployment. The aim of this paper is to find areas of deficiency concerning the implementation of farmer cooperatives in Oman. The study follows the philosophy of realism, as it is delivering real and accurate information. The text uses a mixed method by combining qualitative and quantitative. The research uses questionnaire showing the responses of farmers and ordinary people to collect the data. In addition, an interview showing the importance and the factor of implementing farmer cooperatives. This study uses interviews and questionnaire to gather the data needed to fill the gaps. The findings of this research add deep discovery to the previous studies, regarding the unawareness and knowledge among farmers about the importance, causes and positive effects of cooperatives among farmers and the negative effects that may occur to farmers for refusing to enter farmers' cooperatives and the factors of implementing farmer’s cooperatives. Additional research in this topic is needed for full understanding of making strong relationships and trust between farmers, which convince them to join farmers' cooperatives. The value of this study lies in raising the level of farmer's cooperatives in Oman because of its invaluable role in improving livelihoods, achieving sustainable development, increasing profitability and increasing productive efficiency by finding the common reasons that prevent farmers to join these cooperatives.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Chiputwa, B., Spielman, D. J., & Qaim, M. (2015). Food standards, certification, and poverty among coffee farmers in Uganda. World Development. [online].66, 400-412.Available at: http://www.waeaonline.org/UserFiles/file/JAREMay20169Ihli324-345online.pdf[Accessed 26 June 2019].
     Google Scholar
  2. Feng, L., Friis, A., & Nilsson, J. (2016). Social capital among members in grain marketing cooperatives of different sizes. Agribusiness. [online]. 32(1), 113-126. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/275718256_Social_Capital_among_Members_in_Grain_Marketing_Cooperatives_of_Different_Sizes [Accessed 30 June 2019].
     Google Scholar
  3. Hakelius, K., & Hansson, H. (2016). Measuring changes in farmers’ attitudes to agricultural cooperatives: evidence from Swedish agriculture 1993–2013. Agribusiness. [online]. 32(4), 531-546. Available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/agr.21464 [Accessed 01 July 2019].
     Google Scholar
  4. Chiputwa, B., & Qaim, M. (2016). Sustainability standards, gender, and nutrition among smallholder farmers in Uganda. The Journal of Development Studies. [online].52(9), 1241-1257. Available at: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/104816/1/812454057.pdf.
     Google Scholar
  5. Hao, J., Bijman, J., Gardebroek, C., Heerink, N., Heijman, W., & Huo, X. (2018). Cooperative membership and farmers’ choice of marketing channels–Evidence from apple farmers in Shaanxi and Shandong Provinces, China. Food Policy. [online].74, 53-64. Available at: https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/cooperative-membership-and-farmers-choice-of-marketing-channels-e[Accessed 01 July 2019].
     Google Scholar
  6. Liang, Q., Hendrikse, G., Huang, Z., & Xu, X. (2015). Governance structure of Chinese farmer cooperatives: evidence from Zhejiang province. Agribusiness. [online]. 31(2), 198-214.Available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/agr.21400 [Accessed 27 June 2019].
     Google Scholar
  7. Stamm, M. C. (2018). Ruerd Ruben, Paul Hoebink (eds.): Coffee certification in East Africa: impact on farmers, families and cooperatives. Agriculture and Human Values. [online]. 35(2), 539-540. Available at: https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/agrhuv/v35y2018i2d10.1007_s10460-017-9807-7.html [Accessed 29 June 2019].
     Google Scholar
  8. Van Rijsbergen, B., Elbers, W., Ruben, R., & Njuguna, S. N. (2016). The ambivalent impact of coffee certification on farmers’ welfare: a matched panel approach for cooperatives in Central Kenya. World Development. [online].77, 277-292.Available at: https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/wdevel/v77y2016icp277-292.html [Accessed 28 June 2019].
     Google Scholar
  9. Mojo, D., Fischer, C., & Degefa, T. (2017). The determinants and economic impacts of membership in coffee farmer cooperatives: recent evidence from rural Ethiopia. Journal of Rural Studies. [online]. 50, 84-94. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/312218826_The_determinants_and_economic_impacts_of_membership_in_coffee_farmer_cooperatives_recent_evidence_from_rural_Ethiopia [Accessed 01 July 2019].
     Google Scholar
  10. Van Dijk, W. F., Lokhorst, A. M., Berendse, F., & de Snoo, G. R. (2015). Collective agri-environment schemes: How can regional environmental cooperatives enhance farmers’ intentions for agri-environment schemes? Land Use Policy. [online]. 42, 759-766. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236888395_Temporal_effects_of_agri-environment_schemes_on_ditch_bank_plant_species [Accessed 30 June 2019].
     Google Scholar
  11. Jacobs, K., McKee, G., & Park, J. (2018). Case Studies of Cooperatives in the Value Chain: Texas Cooperatives. [online]. (No. 2166-2018-7872). Available at: https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/ncer18/280131.html [Accessed 30 June 2019].
     Google Scholar
  12. Yu, L., & Nilsson, J. (2018). Social capital and the financing performance of farmer cooperatives in Fujian Province, China. Agribusiness. [online]. 34(4), 847-864.Available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/agr.21560 [Accessed 29 June 2019].
     Google Scholar
  13. Li, F., Liu, Y., & Wu, F. (2019, February). Analysis of the Present Situation of and Countermeasures for Farmers’ Specialized Cooperative in China-Laos Boarder Area. In 2018 International Workshop on Education Reform and Social Sciences (ERSS 2018). Atlantis Press. .[online]. Available at: https://www.atlantis-press.com/proceedings/ncce-18/sessions/2037 [Accessed 02 July 2019].
     Google Scholar
  14. Heerink, N., Heijman, W., & Huo, X. (2018). Cooperative membership and farmers’ choice of marketing channels–Evidence from apple farmers in Shaanxi and Shandong Provinces, China. Food Policy. [online]. 74, 53-64. Available at: https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jfpoli/v74y2018icp53-64.html [Accessed 28 June 2019].
     Google Scholar
  15. Zhong, Zhang, & Bijman, J. (2018). Vertical coordination and cooperative member benefits: Case studies of four dairy farmers’ cooperatives in China. Journal of cleaner production. [online]. 172, 2266-2277. [online]. Available at: http://library.wur.nl/WebQuery/wurpubs/530601 [Accessed 26 June 2019].
     Google Scholar
  16. Shumeta, Z., & D’Haese, M. (2018). Do Coffee Farmers Benefit in Food Security from Participating in Coffee Cooperatives? Evidence from Southwest Ethiopia Coffee Cooperatives. Food and nutrition bulletin. [online].39(2), 266-280. [online]. Available at: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0379572118765341 [Accessed 01 July 2019].
     Google Scholar
  17. Grashuis, J., & Su, Y. (2019). A review of the empirical literature on farmer cooperatives: Performance, ownership and governance, finance, and member attitude. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics. [online]. 90(1), 77-102. Available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/apce.12205 [Accessed 03 July 2019].
     Google Scholar
  18. Yang, H., Vernooy, R., & Leeuwis, C. (2018). Farmer cooperatives and the changing agri-food system in China. China Information. [online]. 32(3), 423-442. Available at: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0920203X16684504 [Accessed 26 June 2019].
     Google Scholar
  19. Ma, M., & Zhu, H. (2018). Efficiency of Decisions under Membership Heterogeneity and Government Regulations: Insights from Farmer Cooperatives in China. [online]. Available at: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/701318?mobileUi=0& [Accessed 30 June 2019].
     Google Scholar
  20. Phillips, D. (1987). Philosophy, Science and Social Inquiries. [Online] 20 p 205. Available at https://www.ualberta.ca/international-institute-for-qualitative-methodology/media-library/international-institute-of-qualitative-methods/webinars/master-class/2017/jmaxwellrealism-and-qualitative-research.pdf.
     Google Scholar
  21. Schwandt, T. (1997). Definitions: Positivism. [Online] 21, pp.103. Available at https://uk.sagepub.com/sites/default/files/upm-binaries/40425_Chapter1.pdf.
     Google Scholar
  22. Trochim, (2006). Inductive and Deductive Research Aproaches. [online]. 22, p.3. Available at https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED542066.pdf.
     Google Scholar
  23. Soiferman, L. (2019). Inductive and Deductive Research Approaches. Compare and Contrast Inductive and Deductive research Approaches, [online] 23, pp.5,6,7. Available at: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED542066.pdf [Accessed 9 May 2019].
     Google Scholar
  24. Hussain, H. (2017). Cabinet: exempt farmers and cooperative societies from the benefits of loans [Online].Alrai.[viewed 10 May 2019].Available from: http://alrai.com/article/10390127/.
     Google Scholar

  25.  Google Scholar
  26. Ma, W. and Abdulai, A. (2017). The economic impacts of agricultural cooperatives on smallholder farmers in rural China, [online] pp.1,2,5. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319862895_The_economic_impacts_of_agricultural_cooperatives_on_smallholder_farmers_in_rural_China [Accessed 20 May 2019].
     Google Scholar
  27. Al–Salouli, W. (2018). «Agricultural Fund»: We target new technology projects with 70% of funding [Online]. Aleqt. [viewed 05 May 2019]. Available from: http://www.aleqt.com/2018/11/27/article_1496676.html.
     Google Scholar
  28. Al-Anbari, J. S. K. (no date). Understanding constraints to the development of the agricultural sector in Oman: An application of the Theory of Planned Behaviour Juma Said Khalfan Al-Anbari [online]. pp.v,vi,vv. [Viewd 03 Feb 2019].Available from: http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/71952/1/19028222_Al-Anabari_thesis.pdf.
     Google Scholar
  29. Bateman, M. (2007). Financial cooperatives for sustainable local economic and social development. Small Enterprise Development, [online] 18(1), pp.37-49. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233703812_Financial_cooperatives_for_sustainable_local_economic_and_social_development [Accessed 13 May 2019].
     Google Scholar
  30. Bello, D. (2005). The Role of Cooperative Societies in Economic Development, [online] 20, pp.14-16. Available at: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/23161/1/The_Role_of_Cooperatives_in_Economic_Development.pdf [Accessed 14 May 2019].
     Google Scholar
  31. Benson, D., Carabini, C., Brander, D. and Romenteau, A. (2017). Good practices in international cooperative development. Why creating a knowledge sharing culture is key for international cooperative development work, [online] 61, p. 39. Available at: https://coopseurope.coop/sites/default/files/REPORT_CEDP_Good%20pracrices%20in%20intl%20development.pdf [Accessed 2 Jun. 2019].
     Google Scholar
  32. Business Studies. (n.d.). Co-operative Society, [online] 102, pp.94,95,96. Available at: http://old.nios.ac.in/Secbuscour/cc09.pdf [Accessed 4 Feb. 2019].
     Google Scholar
  33. C. Tortia, E., Valentinov, V. and Iliopoulos, C. (2013). Agricultural Cooperatives, [online] 2(1), pp.24,25,26,27. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/255697522_Agricultural_Cooperatives [Accessed 6 Feb. 2019].
     Google Scholar
  34. Hun, S., Ito, S., Amekawa, Y. and Isoda, H. (2018). Impacts of Agricultural Cooperatives on Farmers’ Revenues in Cambodia: A Case Study of Tram Kak District, Takeo Province, [online] 10(2), p.85. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322442727_Impacts_of_Agricultural_Cooperatives_on_Farmers'_Revenues_in_Cambodia_A_Case_Study_of_Tram_Kak_District_Takeo_Province [Accessed 20 May 2019].
     Google Scholar
  35. International Labour Conference. (2001). Promotion of cooperatives, [online] 145, pp.142, 141, Available at: https://www.ilo.org/public/english/standards/relm/ilc/ilc89/pdf/rep-v-2.pdf [Accessed 6 Mar. 2019].
     Google Scholar
  36. MAF and ICBA.Oman Salinity Strategy. (2012). GOVERNANCE, LEGAL/REGULATORY FRAMEWORKS AND POLICIES IN AGRICULTURE AND WATER, [online] 30, pp.14,15,26. Available at: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=2ahUKEwjYlfDUpoDjAhVkSxUIHXh1DTIQFjAAegQIARAC&url=http%3A%2F%2Fmaf.gov.om%2FDownload.ashx%3FFile%3DFCKupload%2FFile%2Fbooks%2Fannex4.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2REEWXJwnXr643lGoWQNU4 [Accessed 1 Mar. 2019].
     Google Scholar
  37. Maxwell.J.(no date). Realism and Qualitative Research [online]. pp.1,2. [viewed 04 April 2019]. Available from: https://cloudfront.ualberta.ca/-/media/ualberta/faculties-and-programs/centres-institutes/international-institute-of-qualitative-methods/webinars/master-class/2017/jmaxwellrealism-and-qualitative-research.pdf.
     Google Scholar
  38. McInerney, E. (2012). Cooperatives. Enhancing cooperatives’ impact in the food and agriculture sector: key to implementing the Sustainable Development Goals, [online] pp.2,3,4,5,6. Available at: https://www.un.org/esa/socdev/egms/docs/2016/Coops-2030Agenda/McInerney.pdf [Accessed 1 Jun. 2019].
     Google Scholar
  39. Ministry of agriculture, (2011). Agriculture and Livestock Five-Year Research Strategy 2011-2015, [online] 52, pp.48, 37. Available at: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=2ahUKEwjKq9jLooDjAhW1RRUIHcErAxUQFjAAegQIAxAC&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.maf.gov.om%2FDownload.ashx%3FFile%3DApp_Uploads%2FBulletins%2FFiles%2Fmoa%2520cov%25202%2520fin.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3Qsfw8nrB5ms8ge0ZbYaNv [Accessed 1 Apr. 2019].
     Google Scholar
  40. Ortmann, G. and King, R. (2009). Agricultural Cooperatives I: History, Theory and Problems, [online] 30, pp.43,44,45,46,47,48. Available at: https://tind-customer-agecon.s3.amazonaws.com/e947a433-d9bb-4ef3-bbcf-2bd819ac7fb1?response-content-disposition=inline%3B%20filename%2A%3DUTF-8%27%2746010040.pdf&response-content-type=application%2Fpdf&AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAXL7W7Q3XHXDVDQYS&Expires=1561322654&Signature=mLn1wpEYV40TAKVyrUKn8O%2BnZ%2B8%3D [Accessed 12 May 2019].
     Google Scholar
  41. Saner, R., Yiu, L. and Filadoro, M. (2012). Cooperatives. Cooperatives‐ Conspicuously absent in trade & development discourse, [online] pp.2,3. Available at: https://www.wto.org/english/forums_e/ngo_e/CSEND_cooperatives_inclusive_growth.pdf [Accessed 9 Mar. 2019].
     Google Scholar
  42. Tesfay, A. and Tadele, H. (2013). The Role of Cooperatives in Promoting Socio-Economic Empowerment of Women. Evidence from Multipurpose Cooperative Societies in South-Eastern Zone of Tigray, Ethiopia, [online] 12, pp.1,2,3. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/275745206_The_Role_of_Cooperatives_in_Promoting_Socio-Economic_Empowerment_of_Women_Evidence_from_Multipurpose_Cooperative_Societies_in_South-Eastern_Zone_of_Tigray_Ethiopia [Accessed 16 Apr. 2019].
     Google Scholar