The effect of personal values on employee’s innovative behavior in Vietnamese enterprisesThe Effect of Personal Values on Employee’s Innovative Behavior in Vietnamese Enterprises
Article Main Content
Innovative behavior is becoming increasingly important, especially when the world has witnessed the rapid growth of start-up companies. The purpose of this research is to measure the impact of 10 kinds of personal values on innovative behavior of employees, based on Schwart’s theory of basic values to build the research framework. A total of 455 Vietnamese respondents from different companies participated in this study. The type of this research is a quantitative research and we used SPSS 22.0 to analyze the data used in this study. The result showed that universalism and benevolence positively affected employee’s innovative behavior. Whereas the other values were found to have no significance of innovative behavior in our research.
References
-
Schwartz, S., Basic human values: Theory, measurement, and applications. Revue Francaise de Sociologie, 2006. 47: p. 929-968+977+981.
Google Scholar
1
-
Yuan, F. and R.W.J.A.o.m.j. Woodman, Innovative behavior in the workplace: The role of performance and image outcome expectations. 2010. 53(2): p. 323-342.
Google Scholar
2
-
Taştan, D.D.S. and S. Davoudi, The relationship between organisational climate and organisational innovativeness: testing the moderating effect of individual values of power and achievement. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, 2017. 12: p. 465.
Google Scholar
3
-
Sousa, C. and F. Coelho, From personal values to creativity: Evidence from frontline service employees. European Journal of Marketing, 2011. 45: p. 1029-1050.
Google Scholar
4
-
Dollinger, S.J., P.A. Burke, and N.W. Gump, Creativity and Values. Creativity Research Journal, 2007. 19(2-3): p. 91-103.
Google Scholar
5
-
Purc, E. and M. Laguna, Personal Values and Innovative Behavior of Employees. 2019. 10(865).
Google Scholar
6
-
Hsieh, P.-H., Achievement Motivation, in Encyclopedia of Child Behavior and Development, S. Goldstein and J.A. Naglieri, Editors. 2011, Springer US: Boston, MA. p. 20-21.
Google Scholar
7
-
Grant, A. and N. Rothbard, When in Doubt, Seize the Day? Security Values, Prosocial Values, and Pro activity Under Ambiguity. The Journal of applied psychology, 2013. 98.
Google Scholar
8
-
Schwartz, S., An Overview of the Schwartz Theory of Basic Values. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2012. 2.
Google Scholar
9
-
Hoffmann, S., et al., Under Which Conditions Are Consumers Ready to Boycott or Buycott? The Roles of Hedonism and Simplicity. Ecological Economics, 2018. 147: p. 167-178.
Google Scholar
10
-
Arieli, S., A. Grant, and L. Sagiv, Convincing Yourself to Care About Others: An Intervention for Enhancing Benevolence Values. Journal of personality, 2013. 82.
Google Scholar
11
-
Arieli, S. and O. Tenne-Gazit, Values and Behavior in a Work Environment: Taking a Multi-level Perspective. 2017. p. 115-141.
Google Scholar
12
-
Kasof, J., et al., Values and Creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 2007. 19(2-3): p. 105-122.
Google Scholar
13
-
Schwartz, S., A proposal for measuring value orientations across nations. Questionnaire Package of ESS, 2003: p. 259-290.
Google Scholar
14
-
Cieciuch, J., Kształtowanie się systemu wartości od dzieciństwa do wczesnej dorosłości. 2013: Wydawnictwo Liberi Libri.
Google Scholar
15
-
Roccas, S. and L. Sagiv, Values and behavior: Taking a cross cultural perspective. 2017: Springer.
Google Scholar
16
-
Hair, J., et al., A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling. 2014.
Google Scholar
17
-
Nunnally, J. and I. Bernstein, Psychometric Theory. 1994.
Google Scholar
18