Previous Years Audit Opinions, Profitability, Audit Tenure and Quality Control System on Going Concern Audit Opinion



Abstract Views
832

Downloads
796

Citations

Share

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Submitted Mar 17, 2021
Published Apr 7, 2021
10.24018/ejbmr.2021.6.2.817

Abstract viewed = 832 times

Table of Contents

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

This study was conducted to examine the effect of the previous year's audit opinion, profitability, audit tenure, and quality control systems on going concern audit opinion. This study uses mining sector companies and public accounting firms (PAF) that audited as samples in the study. The data analysis technique used is Path Analysis with Smart PLS 3 with a significance level of 5%. The result indicates that previous year's audit opinion, profitability has a significant impact on going concern audit opinion, meanwhile, audit tenure and quality control system have not significant. Furthermore, other results from this study indicate that the audit tenure, quality control system, and previous year's audit opinion through the quality control system has no effect on going concern audit opinion. The implication of this study to the company is expected to pay attention to various factors, especially financial conditions that can have an influence on going concern audit opinion because this opinion gives a warning to the company.

Keywords: Previous Year's Audit Opinion, Profitability, Audit Tenure, Quality Control System, Going Concern Audit Opinion

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Anita, W. F. (2017). Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Opini Audit Going Concern Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Jurnal Riset Keuangan Dan Akuntansi, 3(2), 87–108.
     Google Scholar
  2. Amjah, M. S. N., Hernawati, E., & Arieftiara, D. (2020). Sistem Pengendalian Mutu Dan Audit Situation Terhadap Ketepatan Pemberian Opini Audit Melalui Professional Scepticism. 220–39.
     Google Scholar
  3. Darmawati, D., & Puspitasari, W. (2018). Pengaruh Penerapan Sistem Pengendalian Mutu (SPM) Terhadap Kemampuan Auditor Dalam Mendeteksi Kecurangan. Jurnal Akuntansi, 4, 967–973.
     Google Scholar
  4. Ermawati, E., & Aswar, K. (2020). Assessing Regional Finance Independence in Indonesia Local Governments. European Journal of Business and Management Research, 5(1), 1-5.
     Google Scholar
  5. Ghozali, I., & Latan, H. (2015). Partial Least Squares Konsep, Teknik Dan Aplikasi Menggunakan Program SmartPls 3.0. Edisi Kedua, Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
     Google Scholar
  6. Ha, T.T., Nguyen, T. A. T., & Nguyen, T.T. (2016). Factors Influencing The Auditor’s Going –Concern Opinion Decision. Journal The 10th International Days of Statistics and Economics, Prague, September, (8-10), 1857–70.
     Google Scholar
  7. IAPI. (2013). Standar Professional Akuntan Publik (SA) 200. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
     Google Scholar
  8. IAPI. (2012). Standar Professional Akuntan Publik (SA) 570. hlm 1–16. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
     Google Scholar
  9. Irwanto, F., & Tanusdjaja, H. (2020). Solvabilitas Terhadap Opini Audit Terkait Going Concern (Studi Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Yang Terdaftar Di BEI Periode 2015). Jurnal Multiparadigma Akuntansi Tarumanagara, 2(1), 298–307.
     Google Scholar
  10. Jasmadeti., Widyastuti, T., & Suyanto. (2018). Pengaruh Profesionalisme Auditor Dan Pertimbangan Tingkat Materialitas Terhadap Kualitas Audit (Studi Empiris Pada Auditor KAP Jakarta Pusat). Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Ekonomi , 6(12), 155–75.
     Google Scholar
  11. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (2018). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal Value Summit: The Power of VE.
     Google Scholar
  12. Krissindiastuti, M., & Rasmini, N. K. (2017). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Opini Audit Going Concern. Accounting Global Journal, 1(1), 451–81.
     Google Scholar
  13. Lestari, P., & Prayogi, B. (2017). Pengaruh Finacial Distress, Disclosure, Dan Opini Audit Tahun Sebelumnya Terhadap Opini Audit Going Concern. Journal Profita, 10(3), 388–98.
     Google Scholar
  14. Lie, C., Wardani, R. P., & Pikir, T. W. (2016). Pengaruh Likuiditas, Solvabilitas, Profitabilitas, Dan Rencana Manajemen Terhadap Opini Audit Going Concern (Studi Empiris Perusahaan Manufaktur Di BEI). Jurnal Berkala Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Indonesia, 1(2), 84–105.
     Google Scholar
  15. Listantri, F., & Mudjiyanti, R. (2016). Analisis Pengaruh Financial Distress, Ukuran Perusahaan, Solvabilitas, Dan Profitabilitas Terhadap Penerimaan Opini Audit Going Concern. Jurnal Media Ekonomi, 16(1), 163–75.
     Google Scholar
  16. Nurrohmah, S., & Fathurochman, T. A. (2016). Pengaruh Sistem Pengendalian Mutu Kantor Akuntan Publik Terhadap Efektivitas Perencanaan Audit. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 4(1), 957–66.
     Google Scholar
  17. Sarwoko, I. (2014). Pengaruh Ukuran KAP Dan Masa Perikatan Audit Terhadap Penerapan Prosedur Audit Untuk Mendeteksi Risiko Kecurangan Dalam Laporan Keuangan, Serta Implikasinya Terhadap Kualitas Audit (Survei Pada Kantor Akuntan Publik Anggota Forum Akuntan Pasar Modal). Jurnal Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Pandjadjaran Bandung, XVIII, (01), 17.
     Google Scholar
  18. Puspaningsih, A., & Analia, A. P. (2019). The Effect of Debt Default , Opinion Shopping , Audit Tenure and Company Financial Conditions on Audit Going Concern Opinion. Journal Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research, 9(2), 115–27.
     Google Scholar
  19. Putra, D. A., Anwar, A. S. H., & Nur, T. (2017). Pengaruh Pertumbuhan Perusahaan, Kondisi Keuangan Perusahaan, Dan Opini Audit Tahun Sebelumnya Terhadap Opini Audit Going Concern. Jurnal Reviu Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 6(1), 857–64.
     Google Scholar
  20. Setiyanti, S. W. (2012). Jenis- Jenis Pendapat Auditor (Opini Auditor). 66(2), hlm 37–39.
     Google Scholar
  21. SholehAsk, M. I. (2015). Audit Finansial, Audit Manajemen,Dan Sistem Pengendalian Intern. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Hukum Islam, 5(2), 1–13.
     Google Scholar
  22. Suksesi, G. W., & Lastanti, H. S. (2016). Pengaruh Opini Audit Tahun Sebelumnya, Reputasi Auditor, Ukuran Perusahaan, Profitabilitas, Likuiditas, Dan Solvabilitas Terhadap Pemberian Opini Audit Going Concern. 1–15.
     Google Scholar
  23. Surianti, E., & Purba, N. M. (2020). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Opini Audit Going Concern Di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Jurnal EMBA: Jurnal Riset Ekonomi, Manajemen, Bisnis Dan Akuntansi, 8(1).
     Google Scholar
  24. Syahputra, F., & Yahya, M. R. (2017). Pengaruh Audit Tenure, Audit Delay, Opini Audit Tahun Sebelumnya Dan Opinion Shopping Terhadap Penerimaan Opini Audit Going Concern Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2013-2015. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Ekonomi Akuntansi (JIMEKA), 2(3), 2–9.
     Google Scholar
  25. Witriasari, S. N., & Arifin, A. (2018). Pengaruh Auditor Client Tenure, Reputasi Auditor, Ukuran Perusahaan, Dan Profitabilitas Terhadap Opini Audit (Studi Empiris Pada Perusahaan Yang Konsisten Terdaftar Dalam Indeks LQ45 Periode 2016-2018 ) Fakultas Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta Email: Sundarinovawitria@gmail.Com Fakultas E. Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi, (2009): 335–54.
     Google Scholar