Perception of Millennial Workforce upon ICT and Organizational Learning and Innovative Performance: The Mediating Role of Ambidexterity

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

  •   Kosasih Kosasih

  •   Arif Widodo Nugroho

Abstract

The company's future performance cannot be reflected only in the current financial performance in the financial statements. Long-term company performance can be reflected by the technology being developed. The role of information and communication technology (ICT) is very important for a company to survive and be able to compete in modern business competition in the era of industry 4.0. Meanwhile, learning organization is fostering communication, knowledge exchange in order to promote the innovation. Ambidexterity capability of organization develops structures to manage innovation and achieve sustained success over time. The purpose of this study is to examine the influence of ICT and organizational learning on firm’s innovative performance which mediated by ambidexterity based on millennial workforce perception. The result of this research found that ICT has significantly positive influence on ambidexterity, but not significantly positive influence on innovative performance. Learning organization has significantly positive influence both on ambidexterity and innovative performance. Ambidexterity has significantly influence on innovative performance. The mediating role of ambidexterity had significantly positive enhanced the influence ICT on innovative performance. Meanwhile, ambidexterity had not significantly positive enhance the influence learning organization on innovative performance.


Keywords: Information and communication technology, Organizational learning, Ambidexterity, Innovative performance

References

Chao, Á. D., Gonzále, J. S., & Sellens, J. T. (2015). ICT, innovation, and firm productivity: New evidence from small local firms. Journal of Business Research, 68(7), 1439–1444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.01.030.

Jorgenson, D. W., & Vu, K. (2007). Information technology and the world growth resurgence. German Economic Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0475.2007.00401.x.

Jorgenson, D. W., Ho, M. S., & Stiroh, K. J. (2008). A retrospective look at the U.S. productivity growth resurgence. In Journal of Economic Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.22.1.3.

Ceccobelli, M., Gitto, S., & Mancuso, P. (2012). ICT capital and labour productivity growth: A non-parametric analysis of 14 OECD countries. Telecommunications Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2011.12.012.

Jorgenson, D. W., Ho, M. S., & Samuels, J. D. (2011). Information technology and U.S. productivity growth: Evidence from a prototype industry production account. Journal of Productivity Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-011-0229-z

Gërguri-Rashiti, S., Ramadani, V., Abazi-Alili, H., Dana, L. P., & Ratten, V. (2017). ICT, Innovation and Firm Performance: The Transition Economies Context. Thunderbird International Business Review. https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.21772.

Guillemette, M. G., & Paré, G. (2012). Toward a new theory of the contribution of the IT function in organizations. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems. https://doi.org/10.2307/41703466.

Schertler, W., & Berger-Koch, C. (1999). Tourism as an information business: The Strategic Consequences of e-Commerce for Business Travel. In Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 1999. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-6373-3_3.

Maslach, D. (2016). Change and persistence with failed technological innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 37(4), 714–723. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2358.

Carmeli, A., & Dothan, A. (2017). Generative work relationships as a source of direct and indirect learning from experiences of failure: Implications for innovation agility and product innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 119, 27–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.03.007.

Argote, L. (2014). Knowledge Transfer and Organizational Learning. In The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of the Psychology of Training, Development, and Performance Improvement. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118736982.ch9.

Bresman, H. (2010). External learning activities and team performance: A multimethod field study. Organization Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0413.

Xu, H., Zhang, X., Liu, L., & Hong, J. (2017). Value effect of rival innovation failure: competition or contagion? China Journal of Accounting Studies, 5(4), 449–467. https://doi.org/10.1080/21697213.2017.1423777.

Felin, T., & Zenger, T. R. (2014). Closed or open innovation? Problem solving and the governance choice. Research Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.09.006.

Natalicchio, A., Messeni Petruzzelli, A., & Garavelli, A. C. (2017). Innovation problems and search for solutions in crowdsourcing platforms – A simulation approach. Technovation, 64–65(May), 28–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2017.05.002.

Ratten, V. (2016). Social media innovations and creativity. In Revolution of Innovation Management: The Digital Breakthrough Volume 1. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-57475-6_8.

Wilkinson, T. J., & Thomas, A. R. (2014). Innovation’s second step. Thunderbird International Business Review. https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.21621.

Gray, J. V., Roth, A. V., & Leiblein, M. J. (2009). Quality risk in offshore manufacturing: An explanation and empirical test. In Academy of Management 2009 Annual Meeting: Green Management Matters, AOM 2009.

Afuah, Allan, Tucci, C. (2012). Studying the Origins of Social Entrepreneurship: Compassion and Does Compassion Matter to Social Entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Review. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2012.0429.

Sieg, J. H., Wallin, M. W., & von Krogh, G. (2010). Managerial challenges in open innovation: A study of innovation intermediation in the chemical industry. R and D Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2010.00596.x.

Guzzini, E., Iacobucci, D., & Palestrini, A. (2018). Collaboration for innovation and project failure. A dynamic analysis. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 27(8), 717–730. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2017.1389125.

Buesa, M., Heijs, J., & Baumert, T. (2010). The determinants of regional innovation in Europe: A combined factorial and regression knowledge production function approach. Research Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.02.016.

Setiawan, K., & Santoso, B. (2017). Influence of Managerial Leadership, Corporate Culture and Erp Implementation on Corporate Performance. Aktual’ni Problemy Ekonomiky = Actual Problems in Economics, (189), 253–259. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/1891693125?accountid=14701%0Ahttp://sfx.scholarsportal.info/ottawa?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&genre=article&sid=ProQ:ProQ%3Aabiglobal&atitle=INFLUENCE+OF+MANAGERIAL+LEADERSHIP%2C+CORPORAT.

Lungeanu, R., Stern, I., & Zajac, E. J. (2016). When do firms change technology-sourcing vehicles? the role of poor innovative performance and financial slack. Strategic Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2371.

Ajayi, O. M. (2013). The impact of employee ambidexterity on organisational and marketing innovations: organisational context for exploiting the present and exploring for the future. Retrieved from http://sfx.scholarsportal.info/ottawa?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&genre=dissertations+%26+theses&sid=ProQ:ProQuest+Dissertations+%26+Theses+Global&atitle=&title=The+impact+of+employee+ambidexterity+on+organisational+a.

Curado, C., Muñoz-Pascual, L., & Galende, J. (2018). Antecedents to innovation performance in SMEs: A mixed methods approach. Journal of Business Research, 89(June 2017), 206–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.12.056.

Preda, A., Crisan, D., & Stanica, J. (2014). The Impact of Ict On Innovation Performance in Europe. Case of Romania. Journal of Information Systems & Operations Management, 8(1), 197–206. Retrieved from http://www.rebe.rau.ro/RePEc/rau/jisomg/Su14/JISOM-SU14-A16.pdf.

Tajasom, A., Hung, D. K. M., Nikbin, D., & Hyun, S. S. (2015). The role of transformational leadership in innovation performance of Malaysian SMEs. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 23(2), 172–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/19761597.2015.1074513.

Cruz-Cázares, C., Bayona-Sáez, C., & García-Marco, T. (2013). You can’t manage right what you can’t measure well: Technological innovation efficiency. Research Policy, 42(6–7), 1239–1250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.03.012.

Abas & Raja (2015), Impact of psychological capital on innovative performance and job stress, Canadian Jopurnal of Administrative Sciences, Volume 32, Issue 2, p. 128-138.

Kilic, K., Ulusoy, G., & Gunday, G. (2014). Journal of Engineering and Innovativeness, operations priorities and corporate performance: An analysis based on a taxonomy of innovativeness. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2014.09.001.

Higón, D. A. (2012). The impact of ICT on innovation activities: Evidence for UK SMEs. International Small Business Journal, 30(6), 684–699. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242610374484.

Bloom, N., Garicano, L., Sadun, R., & Van Reenen, J. (2014). The Distinct Effects of Information Technology and Communication Technology on Firm Organization. Management Science, 60(12), 2859–2885. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.2013.

Sadikin, M., Hardi, H., & Haji, W. H. (2014). IT Governance Self Assessment in Higher Education Based on COBIT Case Study: University of Mercu Buana. Journal of Advanced Management Science, 2(1), 83–87. https://doi.org/10.12720/joams.2.2.83-87.

Steoarthritis, K. N. E. E. O. (2008). O Utcomes of D Ifferent T Ypes of R Esistance T Raining on P Eople With, 2011, 1–13.

Garcia-Alcaraz, J. L., Maldonado-Macias, A. A., Alor-Hernandez, G., & Sanchez-Ramirez, C. (2017). The impact of information and communication technologies (ICT) on agility, operating, and economical performance of supply chain. Advances in Production Engineering & Management, 12(1), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.14743/apem2017.1.237.

Guinot, J., Chiva, R., & Mallén, F. (2013). Organizational trust and performance: Is organizational learning capability a missing link? Journal of Management and Organization, 19(5), 559–582. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2014.3.

Cyert & March, (1963), A Perspective from Organizational Economics, NBER Working group in Organizational Economics, SEPR.

Argyris & Scho¨n, (1978), Organizational learning II: Theory method and practice Reading: Addison-Wesley, XXIX +305 pp, ISBN 0-201-62983-6.

Hedberg, (1981), How Organizations Learn and Unlearn’, in P Nystrom & WH Starbuck (eds.), Handbook of Organizational Design (Vol. 1), Cambridge University Press, London.

Senge, (1990), The Fifth Discipline. The Art And Practice Of The Learning Organization. New York: Doubleday Currency.

Brown & Duguid, (1991), Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organization Science, 2(1), 40–57.

Dibella, Nevis, & Gould, (1996), Understanding Organizational Learning Capability,” Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 33, No. 3, 1996, pp. 361-379. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.1996.tb00806.x.

Chiva, Alegre, and Lapiedra (2007), Measuring Organisational Learning Capability among the Workforce, International Jpurnal Manpower, No. 28(3/4):224-242DOI:10.1108/01437720710755227.

Erkelens, R., van den Hooff, B., Huysman, M., & Vlaar, P. (2015). Learning from Locally Embedded Knowledge: Facilitating Organizational Learning in Geographically Dispersed Settings. Global Strategy Journal, 5(2), 177–197. https://doi.org/10.1002/gsj.1092.

Yan, M., Yu, Y., & Dong, X. (2014). Organizational ambidexterity building via strategic learning and business learning. Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 3584–3593. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2014.446.

Junni, P., Sarala, R. M., Taras, V. A. S., & Tarba, S. Y. (2013). Organizational Ambidexterity and Performance: University of North Carolina at Greensboro University of North Carolina at Greensboro. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 299–312.

Lis, A., Józefowicz, B., Tomanek, M., & Gulak-lipka, P. (2018). The Concept of the Ambidextrous Organization: Systematic Literature. International Journal of Contemporary Management, 17(1), 77–97. https://doi.org/10.4467/24498939IJCM.18.005.8384.

Nosella, A., Cantarello, S., & Filippini, R. (2012). The intellectual structure of organizational ambidexterity: A bibliographic investigation into the state of the art. Strategic Organization. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127012457979.

Goh & Richards (1997), G. (1997). Benchmarking The Learning Capability of Organization, European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 15(5), pages 575-583, October..

Duncan, R. B., & Duncan, R. B. (1972). Characteristics of Organizational Environments and Perceived Environmental Uncertainty, 17(3), 313–327.

Gibson, C. B. (2004). The Antecedents, Consequences, And Mediating Role of Organizational Ambidexterity, 47(2), 209–226.

Cembrero, D. (2011). Ambidexterity as a Solution for the Challenge of Organizing Innovation David Ruiz de Olano Francisco González-Bree, (June).

Turner, N., Maylor, H., & Swart, J. (2015). Ambidexterity in projects: An intellectual capital perspective. International Journal of Project Management, 33(1), 177–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.05.002.

Fu, N., Flood, P. C., & Morris, T. (2016). Organizational ambidexterity and professional firm performance: the moderating role of organizational capital. Journal of Professions and Organization, 3(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpo/jov010.

O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. (2013). Organizational Ambidexterity: Past, Present and Future. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2285704.

Wang, Z., Huang, J., & Tan, B. (2012). Managing Organizational Identity Through Ambidextrous Capabilities: A Dual Level Analysis. PACIS 2012 Proceedings.

Cao, Q., Gedajlovic, E., & Zhang, H. (2009). Unpacking Organizational Ambidexterity: Dimensions, Contingencies, and Synergistic Effects. Organization Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0426.

Del Giudice, M., Soto-Acosta, P., Carayannis, E., & Scuotto, V. (2018). Emerging perspectives on business process management (BPM): IT-based processes and ambidextrous organizations, theory and practice. Business Process Management Journal, 24(5), 1070–1076. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-09-2018-336.

Chen, Y. Y., Yeh, S. P., & Huang, H. L. (2012). Does knowledge management “fit” matter to business performance? Journal of Knowledge Management, 16(5), 671–687. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271211262745.

Sher, P. J., & Lee, V. C. (2004). Information technology as a facilitator for enhancing dynamic capabilities through knowledge management. Information and Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2003.06.004.

Relationships, I., Im, G., Rai, A., & Im, G. (2014). IT-Enabled Coordination for Ambidextrous IT-Enabled Coordination for Ambidextrous Interorganizational Relationships, (April).

Bresciani, S., Ferraris, A., & Del Giudice, M. (2018). The management of organizational ambidexterity through alliances in a new context of analysis: Internet of Things (IoT) smart city projects. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136, 331–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.03.002.

Buchana, Y., Garbutt, M., & Seymour, L. F. (2018). Identifying micro-level generative mechanisms of ICT-enabled performance improvement in resource-constrained healthcare organisations: A critical realist perspective. Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 84(6), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/isd2.12057.

Kunz, W., Schmitt, B., & Meyer, A. (2011). How does perceived firm innovativeness affect the consumer? Journal of Business Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2010.10.005.

Cardona, M., Kretschmer, T., & Strobel, T. (2013). ICT and productivity: Conclusions from the empirical literature. Information Economics and Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoecopol.2012.12.002.

Algharibi, A. J., & Arvanitis, T. N. (2011). Adapting the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) as a tool for validating user needs on the implementation of e-Trial software systems. In Proceedings of HCI 2011 - 25th BCS Conference on Human Computer Interaction. https://doi.org/10.14236/ewic/hci2011.1.

Jacobsen, J., Fosse, H. B., & Sorensen, A. (2018). ITT Intensive Machinery and Equipment, Organizational Change and Productivity Growth. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3096420.

March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning. Organization Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.71.

Amaral, G., Bushee, J., Cordani, U. G., KAWASHITA, K., Reynolds, J. H., ALMEIDA, F. F. M. D. E., … Junho, M. do C. B. (2013). Ambidexterity, Organizational Factors and Environment on Organization’s Performance. Journal of Petrology. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.

Park, Y. K., Song, J. H., Yoon, S. W., & Kim, J. (2014). Learning organization and innovative behavior: The mediating effect of work engagement. European Journal of Training and Development, 38(1–2), 75–94. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-04-2013-0040.

Škerlavaj, M., Song, J. H., & Lee, Y. (2010). Organizational learning culture, innovative culture and innovations in South Korean firms. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(9), 6390–6403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.02.080.

Siagian, G. S., & Ikatrinasari, Z. F. (2019). Pengaruh Manajemen Pengetahuan Terhadap Inovasi: Kasus Industri IT di Indonesia. Operations Excellence: Journal of Applied Industrial Engineering, 11(1), 71. https://doi.org/10.22441/oe.v10.3.2018.017.

Valaei, N., Rezaei, S., & Ismail, W. K. W. (2017). Examining learning strategies, creativity, and innovation at SMEs using fuzzy set Qualitative Comparative Analysis and PLS path modeling. Journal of Business Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.08.016.

Morales, V. J. G., Barrionuevo, M. J., & Montes, F. J. L. (2011). Influence of the level of learning in the organizational innovation and performance: Driving factors of learning. Revista Europea de Direccion y Economia de La Empresa.

Jiménez-Jiménez, D., & Sanz-Valle, R. (2011). Innovation, organizational learning, and performance. Journal of Business Research, 64(4), 408–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2010.09.010.

Simsek, Z., Heavey, C., Veiga, J. F., & Souder, D. (2009). A typology for aligning organizational ambidexterity’s conceptualizations, antecedents, and outcomes. Journal of Management Studies. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00841.x.

Wang, C. L., & Rafiq, M. (2012). Ambidextrous Organizational Culture, Contextual Ambidexterity and New Product Innovation: A Comparative Study of UK and Chinese High-tech Firms. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2012.00832.x.

Simsek, Z. (2009). Organizational ambidexterity: Towards a multilevel understanding. Journal of Management Studies. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00828.x.

Sarkees, M., Hulland, J., & Prescott, J. (2010). Ambidextrous organizations and firm performance: The role of marketing function implementation. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 18(2), 165–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/09652540903536982.

Popadić, M., Černe, M., & Černe, M. (2016). Exploratory and exploitative innovation: The moderating role of partner geographic diversity. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja, 29(1), 1165–1181. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2016.1211951.

Kosasih, K., Wibowo, & Saparuddin. (2020). The influence of ambidextrous organization and authentic followership on innovative performance: The mediating role of change readiness. Management Science Letters, 10(7), 1513–1520. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2019.12.015.

Faisal Ahammad, M., Mook Lee, S., Malul, M., & Shoham, A. (2015). Behavioral Ambidexterity: The Impact of Incentive Schemes on Productivity, Motivation, and Performance of Employees in Commercial Banks. Human Resource Management. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21668.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

How to Cite
Kosasih, K., & Nugroho, A. W. (2021). Perception of Millennial Workforce upon ICT and Organizational Learning and Innovative Performance: The Mediating Role of Ambidexterity. European Journal of Business and Management Research, 6(2), 153–161. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejbmr.2021.6.2.823