Resource Planning as a Panacea for Successful Completion of Water Projects in Semi-Arid Areas in Machakos County, Kenya
Article Main Content
This study aimed at establishing the influence of resource planning on successful completion of water projects in semi-arid areas in Kenya with a specific focus on Machakos County. The target population consisted of 648 representative beneficiaries of water projects in Machakos County, Water Management committee members, Sub-County water officers and Machakos County Local Coordinators who are involved in water projects in Machakos County. A sample of 241 respondents was selected using purposive and simple random sampling procedures. The study had a response rate of 70.5%. Descriptive and inferential statistic was employed to analyze the quantitative data. From the simple linear regression conducted, the findings revealed resource Planning influences successful completion of water projects meaning that there was positive relationship between resource planning and successful completion of water projects in semi-Arid Areas. The study recommends the need for legislative authorities to increase statutory allocation to help enhance successful completion of water projects.
References
-
Ann, K. (2020). What Is a Feasibility Study in Project Management. Project Management Guide.
Google Scholar
1
-
Ballester, A. (2017). Public Participation in Water Planning in the Ebro River Basin (Spain) and Tucson Basin (U.S., Arizona): Impact on Water Policy and Adaptive Capacity Buildin. MDPI.
Google Scholar
2
-
Bro, C., Cow, i. C., & Kampax, -K. (2018). Regional Water Master Plans for Iringa, Ruvuma and Mbeya Regions. Hydrogeology Vol 9. Ministry of Water for Tanzania.
Google Scholar
3
-
Choge and Muturi. (2014). Factors affecting adherence to cost estimates: A survey of construction projects of Kenya National Highways Authority. International Journal of Social Sciences and Entrepreneurship, vol. 1, pp. 689-705.
Google Scholar
4
-
Cullis, J. S. (2018). Incorporating climate change into water resources planning for the town of Polokwane, South Africa. Climatic Change, 437–456.
Google Scholar
5
-
Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford, United Kingdom:. Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
6
-
Kay, j. (2015). On being stuck in the middleor good food costs less sainsbury's. British Journal of Management.
Google Scholar
7
-
Kothari, C. R. (2009). Research Methodology: Methods and Techniques. New Delhi: . New Age Publications.
Google Scholar
8
-
Lockwood and Smits . (2011). Supporting Rural Water Supply: Moving towards a service delivery approach. Warwickshire, UK: Practical Action Publishing Ltd.
Google Scholar
9
-
Lutz-Ley, A. (2020). Dialogic science-policy networks for water security governance in the arid Americas. sciencedirect.
Google Scholar
10
-
Mugenda & Mugenda. (2009). Research Methods.Qualitative and Quantitative Approach. Nairobi: Acts Press.
Google Scholar
11
-
Mugenda, & Mugenda. (2003). Research methods. Nairobi: Acts Press.
Google Scholar
12
-
Njogu, M. J. (2018). Influence of community participation on project performance of ruiri water projects, meru county, kenya. International Academic Journal of Information Sciences and Project Management.
Google Scholar
13
-
Nyangilo. (2012). An assessment of the organization structure and leadership effects on construction projects performance in Kenya.
Google Scholar
14
-
Parkway, M. (2015). SMART Planning: Defining Better Goals for your Business.
Google Scholar
15
-
PMI. (2017). Guide, P. M. B. O. K4th Edition. Newton Square, Pennsylvania, USA.
Google Scholar
16
-
Rakesh, Singh, & Sharma. (2018). Water resources of India. Current Science Association , 794-811.
Google Scholar
17
-
UNICEF, & WHO. (2012). Progress on Drinking water and Sanitation. New York: United Nations.
Google Scholar
18
-
Watt, A. (2020). Resource Planning. BC Campus.
Google Scholar
19
-
World Vision. (2020). Global water crisis: Facts, FAQs, and how to help.
Google Scholar
20