##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

This paper introduces a new leadership model. Staring with the examination of the concept of leadership, leaders’ core skills and the differences between various management definitions, the paper highlights what organizational conditions are needed for leadership to be effective and successful. The results of a sociological study show that leadership always promotes change and involvement. It creates social cohesion and sets a clear direction. The paper focuses on these results to present the “matrix of Polycentric Leadership”. Thanks to this matrix, we can identify four leadership styles: methodical, directive, charismatic, and challenger. The paper concludes that leadership cannot be effective if just one or few of these styles are present: all four styles must be represented, as they are complementary and interact with each other, ensuring the unifying function of leadership. To conclude, the paper demonstrates that leadership is always a polycentric phenomenon that takes place via a network of relations between these four leadership styles. When the interaction does not take place, leadership degenerates, and the shadows of these leadership styles’ take over.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. C. McCauley & C. J. Palus, “Developing the theory and practice of leadership development: A relational view”, The Leadership Quarterly, 2020.
     Google Scholar
  2. Q. Wu, K. Cormican, G. Chen, “A Meta-Analysis of Shared Leadership: Antecedents, Consequences, and Moderators”, Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 2018
     Google Scholar
  3. J.H. Karriker, L. T. Madden, L. A. Katell, “Team Composition, Distributed Leadership, and Performance: It’s Good to Share”, Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 2017.
     Google Scholar
  4. Z. Chen, Y. Yu, S. Huang, “How Shared Leadership in Entrepreneurial Teams Influences New Venture Performance: A Moderated Mediation Model”, Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 2020.
     Google Scholar
  5. D. Van De Mieroop, J. Clifton & A. Verhelst, “Investigating the interplay between formal and informal leaders in a shared leadership configuration: A multimodal conversation analytical study”, Human Relations, 2019, 73(4), 490-515.
     Google Scholar
  6. S. S. Ecetin & S. N. Acikalin Editors, S. N. Acikalin, Chaos complexity and leadership, Cham: Springer, 2018.
     Google Scholar
  7. E. Sinar et. al., “Global leadership forecast 2018. Developmental Dimensions International”, The Conference Board, and Ernst & Young Global Limited, 2018.
     Google Scholar
  8. G. Hamel, “Building an innovation democracy: W. L. Gore”, in The future of management, Harvard: Business School Press, 2007.
     Google Scholar
  9. C. C. Manz, F. M. Shipper and G. L. Steward, “Everyone a Team Leader: Shared Influence at W. L. Gore & Associates”, Organizational Dynamics, 2009, 38(3):239–244.
     Google Scholar
  10. F. M. Schipper and C. C. Manz, “W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc.: a case study”, in Strategic Management: concepts and cases, Irwin, 1999.
     Google Scholar
  11. J. Rao, W. L. Gore-Culture of innovation, Babson, BAB698 April 01, 2012.
     Google Scholar
  12. M. Cannon, J. Thorpe, S. Emili, P. Mader, “W.L. Gore & Associates Inc.: Workplace Democracy in a Transnational Corporation”, Business and Financing Models that Enable Participation, Case Summary No. 3, 2019.
     Google Scholar
  13. R. Deats, Mahatma Gandhi non violent liberator. A biography, New York, New City, 2005.
     Google Scholar
  14. M. Gandhi, Autobiography, New York, Dover Publications, 1983.
     Google Scholar
  15. R. E. Jakoubek, H. L. Wagner, Martin Luther King Jr.: Civil Rights Leader, New York, Chelsea House, 2009.
     Google Scholar
  16. M. L. King Jr., The word of Martin Luther Jr., New York, William Morrow & Co, 2007.
     Google Scholar
  17. S. Dhiman, Gandhi and leadership, New York, Palgrave Macmillan, 2015.
     Google Scholar
  18. L. Calkhoven, DK Life Stories Martin Luther King Jr., London, Penguin Random House, 2019.
     Google Scholar
  19. R. Jahanbegloo, Mahatma Gandhi: A Nonviolent Perspective on Peace, Abingdon, Taylor & Francis Ltd, 2020.
     Google Scholar
  20. K. Magoon, Nelson Mandela: A Leader for Freedom, Edina, ABDO Publishing Company, 2008.
     Google Scholar
  21. N. Mandela, Long walk to freedom. The autography of Nelson Mandela, Boston, Brown and Company, 1994.
     Google Scholar
  22. S. Krensky, DK Life Stories Nelson Mandela, London, Penguin Random House, 2019.
     Google Scholar
  23. R. Branson, Business Stripped Bare, London, Virgin Books Ltd, 2008.
     Google Scholar
  24. D. G. W. Dauphinais, “Creating a federation of nationals cultures. Percy Barnevik”, ABB Asea Brown Boveri Ltd., in Straight from the CEO, New York: Price Waterhouse Coopers, 1998.
     Google Scholar
  25. R. Dick, “Branson’s Virgin The coming of Age of a counter-Cultural Enterprise”, Fontainebleau, INSEAD Case Study, 1995.
     Google Scholar
  26. F. R. M. Kets de Vries, “Charisma in action”, Organizational Dynamics, Winter, 1998.
     Google Scholar
  27. N. Champroux (2014) “Richard Branson, Virgin’s Embedded Entrepreneur. Frankfurt”, World Business History Conference.
     Google Scholar
  28. M. Liphadzi, C. O. Aigbavboa & W. D. Thwala, “A Theoretical Perspective on the Difference between Leadership and Management”, Procedia Engineering, 196 478 – 482, 2014.
     Google Scholar
  29. B. N. Wajdy, “The differences between management and leadership”, Sinergi, Volume 7, No 1., 2017.
     Google Scholar
  30. P. Ellis & J. Abbott, “Are leadership and management different?”, Journal of Kidney Care, 5(1), 45–47, 2020.
     Google Scholar
  31. A. Zaleznik, “Managers and leaders: are they different?”, Boston, Harvard Business Review, May-June, 1977.
     Google Scholar
  32. W. Bennis and B. Nanus, in the work cited, 1985.
     Google Scholar
  33. C. G. Jung, The archetypes and the collective unconscious, New York, Princeton University Press, 1969 [1934].
     Google Scholar
  34. A. Cain, “6 of the most spectacular business failures in history”, Insider, Nov. 7, 2016.
     Google Scholar
  35. J. P. Spillane, “Distributed leadership”, The Educational Forum, 69(2), 143-150, 2005.
     Google Scholar
  36. E. M. Camburn, B. Rowan and J. Taylor, “Distributed leadership in school: the case of elementary schools adopting comprehensive school reform models”, Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25(4); 347-73, 2003.
     Google Scholar
  37. J. Zhang, S. R. Faerman, R. Sue, “Distributed leadership in the development of a knowledge sharing system”, European Journal of Information Systems, 16(4), 479–493, 2007.
     Google Scholar
  38. J.-L. Denis, A. Langley and V. Sergi, “Leadership in the plural”, The Academy of Management Annals, vol. 6, no. 1, 211-283, 2012.
     Google Scholar
  39. L. White, G. Currie and A. Lockett, “Pluralized leadership in complex organisations: exploring the cross-network effects between formal and informal leadership relations”, The Leadership Quarterly, 27 (2016), 280-297, 2016.
     Google Scholar
  40. K. Otter and D. Paxton, “A journey into collaborative leadership: moving toward innovation and adaptability”, New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, no 156, 2017.
     Google Scholar