Research Article

A Review: Product Pricing of Islamic Banking in Indonesia

Radia Purbayati
Bandung State of Polytechnic, Indonesia
Kurnia Fajar Afgani
Bandung Institute of Technology, Indonesia
* Corresponding author
Agil Krisna Rivanda
Bandung State of Polytechnic, Indonesia
DOI icon 10.24018/ejbmr.2021.6.3.856

Read Counter
1153

Downloads
1035

Citations

Share

Article Sidebar

Submitted 2021-04-19
Published 2021-05-18

Read counter = 1153 times

Table of Contents

Article Main Content

Indonesia is a country with the largest Muslim population in the world with a Muslim population reaching 87% of the total population. This is an opportunity for Islamic Banks to be able to grow and develop as a bank with the concept of a profit-sharing bank. It is appropriate for all operational activities, including pricing stipulations for Islamic banking products, to be free from the element of interest (interest rate free). However, in practice, there are still pricing stipulations in Islamic banking products that benchmark interest rates. This study aims to review the pricing determination of Islamic banking products in Indonesia. The method used in this research proposal is a literature review. The literature review produced several alternative purposed for the Islamic Pricing Benchmarking method as a benchmark that can be used by Islamic banking in determining the pricing of its products.

Keywords: Islamic Banking, Price Benchmarking

References

  1. Hamza, H. dan Kachtouli, S (2014), Competitive Conditions and Market Power of Islamic and Conventional Commercial Banks”: Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, Vol. 5 No. 1 pp. 29-46. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-05-2012-0030.
     Google Scholar
  2. Ghauri,S. (2015). “Why Interest-Rate Cannot Benchmark for Islamic Financial Product Pricing?”, Benchmarking: An International Journal, Vol. 22 No. 7, pp. 1417-1428. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-04-2013-0049.
     Google Scholar
  3. Abduh, M. (2017). “Competitive Condition and Market Power of Islamic Banks in Indonesia”: International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, Vol. 10 No. 1, pp. 77-91. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-09-2015-0098.
     Google Scholar
  4. Sing, Liau-Y. "Islamic Benchmark Financing Rate Not Expected in Near Term": Global Islamic Finance Magazine. Accessed on 2020.
     Google Scholar
  5. Uj Jaman, Bashir. 2011. Benchmarking in Islamic Finance : Markfield Institud Of Higher Education (Mihe) University of Gloucestershire.
     Google Scholar
  6. Researchers of Islamic Departement. 2013. “Index of Real Sector Returns as Price Benchmarking for Islamic Banking Products”: Tazkia Islamic Finance and Business Review Vol 7.1.
     Google Scholar
  7. Ghauri,S. (2015). “Why Interest-Rate Cannot Benchmark for Islamic Financial Product Pricing?”, Benchmarking: An International Journal, Vol. 22 No. 7, pp. 1417-1428. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-04-2013-0049.
     Google Scholar
  8. Ismail, Abdul Ghafar. 2008. Pricing on the Islamic Banking Products : Working Paper in Islamic Economic and Finance No. 0811.
     Google Scholar
  9. Saba, Irum dan Nidal Al Sayyeed. 2010. Economic Pricing Mechanism for Islamic Financial Intruments: Ijarah Model. Munich Personal RePec Archive MPRA Paper No. 20685, hhtp://mpra.ub.unimuecher.de/20685/mprapaperno.20685.posted. 16 February 2010 00:29 utc.
     Google Scholar
  10. Ismail, Abdul Ghafar dan Noraziah Che Arshad. 2010. Pricing on The Islamic Banking Products, Malaysian Management Review, Malaysia.
     Google Scholar
  11. Ahmed, Sawar Uddin, etc. 2014, “Pricing Lingkage Between Islamic Banking and Conventional Banking: The Case of Bangladesh” International Journal of Finance and Banking Studies, Vol 3, No. 4, 2014.
     Google Scholar
  12. Anuar, Khairul, etc. 2016. Asian Investor: Apakah Bank Syariah Benar-Benar Bebas Bunga?
     Google Scholar
  13. https://wwww.asianinvestor.net/article/are-islamicbanks-really-interest-rate free/, 5 Mei 2016.
     Google Scholar
  14. Essia Ries Ahmed, AMd Aminul Islam, Tariq Tawfeeq Yousif Alabdullah, Azlan Bin Amran, 2018. Proposed the Pricing Model as an alternative Benchmark. Benchmarking: An International Journal, Vol 25, Issue: 8, pp. 2892-2912.
     Google Scholar
  15. Purbayati, Radia. 2019. Evaluasi Praktek Perbankan Syariah di Indonesia: Interest Rate Free? : Ekspansi: Jurnal Ekonomi, Keuangan, Perbankan dan Akuntansi ISSN (Online): 2580-7668 ISSN (Print): 2085-5230 Vol. 11 No. 2 (November 2019), Hal 231-250.
     Google Scholar
  16. Demilio, R. (1995). The Basics of Benchmarking , Portland, USA:Productivity Press.
     Google Scholar
  17. Uj Jaman, Bashir. 2011. “Benchmarking in Islamic Finance”: Markfield Institud Of Higher Education (Mihe) University of Gloucestershire.
     Google Scholar
  18. Researchers of Islamic Departement. 2013. Index of Real Sector Returns as Price Benchmarking for Islamic Banking Products: Tazkia Islamic Finance and Business Review Vol 7.1.
     Google Scholar
  19. Ahmed, et al. 2018. Proposed the Pricing Model as an Alternative Islamic Benchmark: Benchmarking: An International Journal, Vol. 25, Issue 8, pp. 2892-2912.
     Google Scholar
  20. Omar, et al. 2010. Islamic Pricing Benchmarking: International Shari’ah Research Academy for Islamic Finance No. 17.
     Google Scholar
  21. Ismail, Abdul Ghafar dan Noraziah Che Arshad. 2010. Pricing on The Islamic Banking Products, Malaysian Management Review, Malaysia.
     Google Scholar
  22. Saba, Irum dan Nidal Al Sayyeed. 2010. Economic Pricing Mechanism for Islamic Financial Intruments: Ijarah Model. Munich Personal RePec Archive MPRA Paper No. 20685, hhtp://mpra.ub.unimuecher.de/20685/mprapaperno.20685.posted. 16 February 2010 00:29 utc.
     Google Scholar
  23. Researchers of Islamic Departement. 2013. Index of Real Sector Returns as Price Benchmarking for Islamic Banking Products : Tazkia Islamic Finance and Business Review Vol 7.1.
     Google Scholar
  24. Pesaran, Hashem & Smith, Richard & Shin, Yongcheol. (2001). Bound Testing Approaches to the Analysis of Level Relationship. Journal of Applied Econometrics. 16. 289-326. 10.1002/jae.616.
     Google Scholar
  25. Ali, Mohsin dan Azmi, Choudarry Wajahat Naeem. 2014. Islamic Finance Benchmark : Journal of Islamin Business and Magement: A Possible Solution Revisited Vol. 4 No. 2.
     Google Scholar
  26. Supriyanto, Trisilahadi. 2016. “Rate of Profit as a Pricing Benchmark in Islamic Banking to Create Financial Stability”: Presented at International Conference on Islamic Economic and Finance. University of Toronto. Canada.
     Google Scholar
  27. Ahmed, et al. 2018. "Proposed the Pricing Model as an Alternative Islamic Benchmark": Benchmarking: An International Journal, Vol. 25, Issue 8, pp. 2892-2912.
     Google Scholar
  28. Haradhan, Mahojan. 2018. "Qualitative Research Methodology in Social Science and Related Subjuects": Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People, Vol. 7, Issue 01, pp. 23-48.
     Google Scholar
  29. Hart, C. 1998. Doing Literature Review: Releasing the Social Science Research Imagination. London, UK: Sage Publication.
     Google Scholar
  30. Webster, J dan Watson R. 2002. Analyzing the Past to Prepare for The Future: Writing a Literature Reviews. MIS Quarterly, 26(2), 13-23.
     Google Scholar
  31. Shaw, J. 1995. A Shema Approach to The Formal Literature Review in Engineering Theses. System, 23(3), 325-335.
     Google Scholar
  32. Levy dan Ellis. 2006. “A System Approach to conduct an Effective Literature Review in Support of Information System Researc”: Informing Science Journal Vol. 9, p. 181-212.
     Google Scholar
  33. Snyder, Hannah. 2019. "Literature Review as a Reasearch Methodology: An Overview Guidelines": Journal of Business Research Vol 104, pp. 333-339.
     Google Scholar
  34. Levy dan Ellis. 2006. “A System Approach to conduct an Effective Literature Review in Support of Information System Research”: Informing Science Journal Vol. 9, p. 181-212.
     Google Scholar
  35. Greenhalgh, et al. “A Systematic Literature Review Using the Meta-Narrative Methode”: Tension and Paradoxex in Electronic Patien Record Research. University College London.
     Google Scholar
  36. Scherer, F. M. 1971. Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance. New York: Rand McNally & Co.
     Google Scholar
  37. Ross, S. A., 1978. A simple approach to the valuation of risky streams. Journal of Business 51 (July): 453-75.
     Google Scholar
  38. Gordon, Lawrence A., and Michelle M. Hamer. (1988). Rates of return and cash flow profiles: An extension. Accounting Review, Vol. 63(3): 514-521.
     Google Scholar
  39. Kassim et al, 2017. “What Drives House Price in Malaysia? In Search of An Alternative Pricing Benchmark for Islamic Home Financing”. Journal of the Malaysian Institute of Planners, Volume 15 Issue 4 (2017), pp. 21–34.
     Google Scholar
  40. Omar et al, 2010. “An Islamic Pricing Benchmark” ISRA Research Paper (No. 17/2010).
     Google Scholar
  41. Mirakhor, A. (1996), “Cost of Capital and Investment in a Non-Interest Economy”, Islāmic Economic Studies, Vol. 4, No. 1.
     Google Scholar
  42. Iqbal, Z., 2002. “The Benchmark Issue in the Islāmic Financial System”, The American Journal of Islāmic Social Sciences, 16: 2, pp. 46-53.
     Google Scholar
  43. Tobin, J. 1969. “A General Equilibrium Approach to Monetary Theory”, Journal of Money Credit and Banking, Vol. 1, February, pp. 15-29.
     Google Scholar
  44. Fumio, H. 1982. “Tobin’s marginal Q and average Q”, Econometrica, Vol. 50, pp. 213-224.
     Google Scholar
  45. Supriyanto, Trisiladi. 2016 “Rate of Profit as a Pricing Benchmark In Islamic Banking” International Conference On Islamic Economic And Finance.
     Google Scholar
  46. Ahsan et al. 2018. “Can Islamic banks have their own benchmark?” Emerging Markets Review 35 (2018) 120–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2018.02.002.
     Google Scholar
  47. Schwartz, Eduardo S & Longstaff , Francis A. (1995). A Simple Approach to Valuing Risky Fixed and Floating Rate Debt. The Journal of Finance (1995), 50(3), 789–819, https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814759595_0011.
     Google Scholar
  48. Collin et al. 2001. The Determinants of Credit Spread Changes. The Journal of Finance, Vol. 56, No.6. (Dec., 2001), pp. 2177-2207.
     Google Scholar
  49. Covrig, V., Low, B.S., Melvin, M., 2004. A yen is not a yen: Tibor/libor and the determinants of the japan premium. J. Financ. Quant. Anal. 39 (1), 193–208.
     Google Scholar